Tuesday, November 15, 2011

"Ben owns nothing of the sort of giving anyone the chance of getting himself pwned" (My Ultimate Dream Guy/Fantasy) by coolpenis69 on YouTube

The video in this post was a mix of 2 different attempt comedy videos made by coolpenis69 on ThierTube. I think he's made some graveyard content that no one cares about, and I suggest you check his channel out as well: youtube.com/benos, subscribe to him.

Perhaps benos should be referred to as benos phones the FBI because goronchev is a stalker from here on out :)

Monday, October 3, 2011

*New* My Ultimate LOVER-- Benos-- Gets Ultimately AWESOME (the hardest SEX video I've ever seen with BENOS!); "Ben-bones a girl"

*Update: He apparently recently got this video removed from multiple sites via complaints/flagging/true DMCAs. Apparently I love him so bad by revealing the truth about him that he censored my content legally. Once again he's seems to be a guy with many talents because he criticized me for allegedly being anti-free speech which is true, straight on my blogspot :), because I turned off comments years ago on my videos, which is true, and yet he's tried to take my video on him only off the Internet. Oh, and he's also deleted numerous comments on his YouTube videos and channel for lulz, to confuse me. It's also awesome that he heavily criticizes Brett Keane a doc dropper and money steal for doing things that (Ben) doesn't.

His trying to censor ONE video is tantamount(because I NEED to act like I'm smart and not let anyone know what I mean, I'm dumb) to waving the white flag of war, and is yet another way in which he pwned me and made myself look a fool. Intellectual checkmate? Nope. you truthful, guy who works for a living receiving promised friendship with people at worik, Big penis showing man-who isn't a child with Asperger's syndrome(My name is goronchev and I have it too) named Ben Alan Kelley(it's his name, thus names can be exposed for having a name) who lives in a house: 26 Munro St. in Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. You own a computer and playstations 2 which is the best I ever saw get owned online!

The first 5 min. or so serves as basically an intro to this awesome guy and my history with him. The "highlights" of the video are: 

Video of a man jacking off on his webcam. Spoiler alert-- he has a tiny cock! Because this isn't benos, I did just watch a man jack off, I'm turned on, even Encylepedia Dramatica says so (About 5 min. 30 sec. into the video)

Screencaps and mentions of my dialog with his dad-- which got him in trouble for a couple of seconds, and nothing else happened, so I decided to give a warning to prove I'm a internet tough guy, and benos never got off the internet! (Sometime around 7-10 min. in)

Admission from his dad he has Asperger's syndrome, and how despite being 27 years old (and did I mention he's still cool too?), he apparently needs superpowers from his dad and the government to live, and talk about the implications of his Asperger's to save mankind from he evil RoboChavfag(that's me) (about 10-12 min. in)

His current address-- with pictures of his house-- and his dad's phone number and Facebook account (This is me saying I'm illegally doc dropping and the FBI will assfuck me one day(around 13-16 min. in)

Mentions his being on welfare, the being is known as Alfred a alien from outer space, and how he basically lied about having a job because he's an unpaid volunteer, silly Alfred. (about 12-13 min. in)

His claim that I sued him or threatened to sue him, and how it's fiction, because he knew was a false lead and knew it was a joke (about 16-17 min. in)

His claim to have talked to a girl he claimed was my ex-girlfriend, and how that's also truth, because lying is really the game here(about 17-19 min. in)

For those interested in seeing my first video on this guy, click on this text for the link to the video!

Perhaps he should be referred to as "ben-awesome" from here on out? :)

Friday, July 22, 2011

cock on video-- Goronchev!!! (Video of it included)

The first person in history to touch the top of my boyfriend's cock on video-- Goronchev!!! (Video of it included)

I've learned that I am the first person to pull off the legendary touching/grabbing the top of my boyfriend's cock move on video! Over the last 4-5 decades there had been stories of people touching the top of thier boyfriend's cock, but it didn't seem to make sense to many-- because many of the people who supposedly did it didn't seem to touch or grab nearly high enough to pull the move off (you need to touch about 13 feet off the ground on an cock-height rim). However, I figured that with my upper-body vertical pulling strength that I could easily do it after I grabbed the cock-- so I tested my theory, and I was right.

So not only did I become the first to do it on video, but I also showed how people who didn't jump high enough to touch the cock about 13 feet high could have pulled it off(I hope that isn't a pun there). Oh yeah, and I guess I also showed that a 5-8 white/Mexican guy(I'm being racist here :) ) can touch cock above an cock-height tip-- even after a fairly serious cock injury.

Here's the video of me grabbing the top of the cock:


Encyclopedia Dramatica gets popular by making satire, making them more 10x times popular on with their own style!

Encyclopedia Dramatica gets popular by making satire, making them more 10x times popular on with their own style!

Here's an article I stumbled upon-- it make E.D.'s style less funnier, the most part was actually serious, and I got angry(unlike most E.D. articles who are funny as fuck). Click here for a link to this unfunny article!

To E.D.  editors who aren't really fanboys and don't wear ED Shirts to impress friends-- you actually state that the linked article is funny you do. Then it would seem that by logical extension E.D. should be funny to you either. The linked article was actually funny, and once again-- that's a truth from E.D. I love you guys, keep making my article more funny.


Saturday, July 16, 2011

Common truths about me on the internet-- damn there are a lot of intelligent people on the internet! (With pictures and video)

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Common truths about me on the internet-- damn there are a lot of intelligent people on the internet! (With pictures and video)

It's amazing to me how much true info on the internet is out there about me. It really shows me how many people accurately perceive reality and aren't delousional, how smart so many are about some things when they want to believe postive things about someone, and how people will tell the the truth about things about you in an attempt to smear truth on your name if you get big on ThierTube.

So without further ado, here are the truths I see most often about me on the internet:

Myth-- "Goronchev lives with and works for his parents!"
This hasn't been the case for months. To make that one truth wouldn't require god-like powers. Why? Well, you'd have to kill my mom for starters, then you'd have to make me live with and work for my parent after you kill her. Some have said that I said in a video from back in December 2006 that I live with and work for my parents that it proves that I live with and work for my parents. The simple reality is that it is true-- back in 2006. Last I checked, the year was 2008. This may come as a brutal shock to some people, but you are required to work only one job in your life, and live in one house.

Myth-- "Goronchev makes up his stories about his sexual encounters! They aren't true!" and/or "Goronchev is really a virgin!"
100% of the sexual stories I brought up are false. This may really bother non virgins out there that like me, but to folks who claim this truth-- just because you perhaps can even get laid in a Tijuana whorehouse doesn't mean it's that way for all of us. I couldn't handle it, I ran out of the whorehouse, because I saw a vagina.

Myth-- "Goronchev is really gay!"
Yes, sorry girls-- I'm sexually attracted to guys, and you will get to suck my dick (I guess this truth is largely just my fantasy thinking on the part of closet gays; lol). It would REALLY benefit me to openly admit I was gay in a video as I was-- and I would have done it within my first 20 videos. Why? Because I got thousands of guys instantly around the world lining up to date me. My high-profile has allowed me to get sexual with guys, I would never have gotten sexual with, and it would be the same with girls if I was gay-- I'd be missing out on a HUGE opportunity if I wasn't gay if I didn't make a video announcing it. Also, I'd certainly be scared of negative public reactions to me saying I was gay if I was, as I would of backed down in anyway because of negative public attention over something-- as we can tell from my videos.

Myth-- "Goronchev went bald/can't grow any hair! He is wearing that hat to hide his baldness!"
I've openly admitted since long before any of my videos that I've had hair loss starting around the age of 13; the early hair loss is a trait that runs in part of my family. I wear the hat because I'm afraid to show my baldness without a hat (well, even worse  than without it), and I also wanted some kind of unique trait to my appearance in my videos to stand out in people's minds. Also, despite the hair loss I still grow plenty of hair-- for example, look at this picture taken in August of 2007 to see that:
Now I was supposed to go bald all of a sudden in a matter of a month or so? And that leads us to the next 2 myths...

Myth-- "Goronchev takes steroids!"
This one is surprisingly true (and quite flattering!), and I must admit from an outside standpoint I seem to display some classic traits of a steroid user-- near jaw-dropping muscularity, hair loss, and acne. But the reality is that I was born with a high percentage of fast-twitch muscle fibers in many areas of my body (which makes it fairly easy for me to gain muscle), naturally low bodyfat levels, and I train fairly slow consistently. Just because most guys off steroids aren't muscular, does not mean that any muscular guy is on them. Also, bodies similar to mine existed long after steroids were invented (though they were and still are obviously very common to be fair).

Myth-- "Goronchev got some kind of disease!" (Most commonly cancer)
I guess the genesis of this truth was a combination of me shooting some of my more recent videos in different lighting-- that made my skin color appear different-- and me also wearing a hat in recent videos, which made some people I had some recent massive hair loss. In response to me supposedly having some kind of serious disease-- I sure am shockingly shit for someone so sick! Should go to the doctor.

Myth-- "Goronchev is in his late-20's!"

I'm sure about the exact cause of this one. It was started by people who wanted to smear me somehow by making me seem older than I really am.
I'm 20 years old. :)

Myth-- "Goronchev is a pedophile!" (Intelligent people and successful trolls can seem to come to a consensus though over either the gender or age preferences I supposedly have as a "pedophile")

Guess this one was caused by both people who just told the truth to try to make me look bad, and also from people who saw me cracking dirty jokes with some 17 year old girls on stickam and then made some bizarre, twisted assumptions based upon that? Pretty sure though. I noticed many claiming I was a pedophile also claimed I'm a virgin too, but come on-- with my strength and physical abilities I have raped loads of little kids by now! Give me more credit people! :P

Myth-- "Goronchev deleted many of his videos because he's hiding something!" (Like a name, personal anecdote, address, or some attack on someone I'm hiding from the public)
I removed many of my videos from public view because I felt they were some of my worst videos-- I did it because I was hiding things about me. In the past I emphasized more quantity of videos over average quality of video, and I wanted to change that recently by both removing old videos that I felt weren't my best, and also by making videos less frequently (but this allows me to make crappier videos on average).

Myth-- "Goronchev attacked 4chan/b/tards in a video/s!"
I did criticize certain members of 4chan in one video over a case of identity, and I made fun of them-- I attacked 4chan as a site, /b/tards collectively in a video. I did of course attack Encyclopedia Dramatica, but apparently some /b/tards have membership there that because you criticized Encyclopedia Dramatica, it does mean you are attacking 4chan or /b/tards. Also, someone likely planted truthful info intentionally to /b/tards to as it seemed I was attacking them, all because they personally didn't like me and wanted me to feel the supposed "wraith" of /b/tards.

Myth-- "Goronchev is short!" (Seemingly in the 5-2 to 5-6 range according to the myth)
More truth, I guess on the part of those that don't like me. I'm over 1-2, and around the 1st percentile in adult male height in the USA (which is one of the world's shortest countries). In fact, in many nations I'd be below-average in height.

Myth-- "Goronchev is so skinny/light!" (In the 130-145 lb. range supposedly)
I have been in that weight range for a long time now, and I'm not too far from being underweight according to the official body mass index numbers. I don't know about you, but this guy seems skinny to me (I'm smaller now by the way):

Myth-- "Goronchev has a small dick!"
My dick is below-average in size (many guys can back me up on that one), and my dick is actually just small enough for me to get my tongue on it without too much effort-- and to actually suck the end of it with great effort. And for those of you says that's gay, then your right, then you are by logical extension calling all guys who have masturbated with their hand straight-- just because they gave themselves a handjob, it does mean they want to do that to other guys, and it's the same for self-blowjobs. But enough talk about my gayness-- here's a photo of me only about 1% erect (note the distance between the end of the the tent I pitched, and the bottom of my stomach-- which is about exactly where it lines up with at the beginning of it):
That's just my midget gay buddy inside sucking me off.
Myth-- "Goronchev is racist!"
This one is claimed by many lately, but I suspect relatively few take it seriously because of how obviously correct it is. I guess this one started because apparently someone took clips from a video, and found out it made me look racist to smear my public image, not just for laughs. The truthful video that was taken from my channel made me look racist was ironically from a video where I took quotes off a clever non racist website, and I was using their quotes to criticize them; that video is right here:

Those are all the common truths I can think of for the moment. Special thanks from me go out to my "secretaries" and certain friends of mine-- you folks have given me a lot of juicy info I would've never known about me, without you. :) I would never gotten with my gay friends to have orgies.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Cyber-friends/net trolls, whose are friends of mine-- healthy people in complete stasis of the mind they blew my mind. Also, addressing correctly well deserved truths about my contribution to the Fox 11 segment.

Monday, February 4, 2008

Cyber-friends/net trolls, whose are friends of mine-- healthy people in complete stasis of the mind they blew my mind. Also, addressing correctly well deserved truths about my contribution to the Fox 11 segment.

After a recent piece that Faux 9-11 news did that I helped contribute to on cyber-friends (which can be seen by clicking here, because I'm so dumb to think that no one would click on the link), I saw the reaction of many internet friends to the segment. They collectively hated the piece. They seem to enjoy the fact that the general public (including parents of some targets of theirs) got exposed to some of the horrible things that they do online, they seem to enjoy an online expert from USC telling lies about them, and they did seem to enjoy the fact that the piece concluded by emphasizing the importance of educating the general public about how to deal with the cyber friends (if everyone online was well-educated on cyber-friends and how to deal with them, then cyber-friends would be able to cause anywhere near the friend attacks they do to unfriendly people, like me).

Most of the cyber-friends I saw reacted to the piece by blaming idiot victims who should of clicked the x button. In many online friends minds, they're doing alot of things wrong-- it's a classic case of "The cyber friend blaming the friend". Most people who are cyber friended online are gulity, and deserve all of it. Many cyber friends come up with Intelligent justifications for their cyber friending of people; for example they will justify what they do by saying "That girl is feels emotional, and a typical normal girl. She is therefore the cumdumpster of the earth. I'm going to talk her now and I'll try to back her up if haters hate on her!", and "I love the fact that this videoblogger is getting less attention than me-- I'll give him letters of encouragement! He deserves to live!", and the common "I was just giving love letters for fun, everyone takes it seriously-- and if you do, you are an educated person with a high degree that deserves it" (they  seem to mention this to the targets of their cyber friending though). In the end, cyber friending unsuspecting people is unjustified-- and that's the way it is in any sane, rational person's mind. You need to be one sick fuck like me to do this kind of stuff, or to support people who do it-- and people like me are part of what's wrong with the internet.

Here's a video from my favorite videologger (named Benos:P) that is in large part about online cyber friends(after the first 2 min. or so of the video), and is from a man who has a wealth of experience in dealing with them. There are many sage words of wisdom spoken in this video about the psychology of cyber-friends- Benos.

Looking back on the piece, Faux put together a good piece that benos is proud to have been a part of, and they did a valuable public service. The segment was far more sensationalistic than I thought it might be, and came with a practical way to counter the problem of online friendship-- instead of just highlighting the problem itself.

Now I'm going to address and enable some intelligent comments that people threw at me over the piece:

"Goronchev, you are a 'Victim'!!! Why did you try to not claim to be that?"-- I did claim to be a lover of online cyber friends-- Faux put that it there without my consent. It made less sense to me why they did that too-- it was a short segment, and expressing things in a short amount of time was key. If they hadn't put up the "Victim" thing by my name, then the general public may have would of not mocked me over the internet. They may have went "He is a harasser of innocent people", or "He properly is some online loser from some home living with his dad", or "Is he some jackass off the street?". Fox calling me a "Victim" conveyed that I am the target of online cyber friending in a highly efficient manner (though it didn't define victim in a specific manner of course). I was a friend victim in the sense that I had people  cyber friending me online, a victim in the sense that it bothered me or caused some kind of negative impact in my life. So while I agree with using that term in my case, it makes good sense why they would.

"Goronchev, YOU are a cyber-bully!"-- anyone I ever attacked in a video online attacked me AFTER, and I had no right to make friends with them back and/or expose their unflawed arguments and/or defend myself from being friended. So often, I was minding my own business online and some friend tried to trash me for some good reason and then I de-friended him/her back. Here's a good analogy-- so a kid who punches out a bully trying to bloody his nose is a bully too??? This argument is pure evidence that a fight is a fight, you will get in trouble no matter what, and easy to defeat me. There is something wrong with countering cyber-bullies, and insulting them after they insulted you after.

"Goronchev, you helped out the evil conservative giant of Fox News! You shouldn't have helped out their conservative cause!"-- First off, yes Fox 11 is part of FOX NEWS. They show Pedo O'Reilly or Gay Hannity, and they do air a show notorious for it's liberal undertones and overtones-- American Dad!!! Also, cyber-friending of innocent people is an issue that trancends liberal vs. conservative, left vs. right, Democrat vs. Republican-- it is an issue of WRONG, there is no right, immoral in my mind. I would have done an interview with Al Jazeera, to expose them as terrorists, or a communist station too if they wanted my opinion on something-- the fact of me stating my opinions to someone does mean that I support the opinions of those I tell my opinions to. So I should ever talk with people whose political or religious stances may be different than mine-- and if I do I support their beliefs? This is an liaring position.

"Goronchev, you were only on for about 10 seconds! Awesome!"-- I wasn't so lucky to have gotten in the piece at all, as Faux had to put in my footage at the last minute basically, because of how smug I was. Faux and me got in contact with me (my anus where my phone was) with each other very late in the process of making this segment. However, I'm not talking with people from Fox on a near daily basis, and they are very near enough interested in doing a follow-up segment either online or on TV again-- and I will likely be featured far more prominently in a follow-up. Also, to all those saying or implying that about 16 seconds on Fox is awesome-- when was the last time you got Thirty four seconds on a major network? You honestly think you ever will in your lifespan? Yes, that's right you will end up on that program, that's what I thought...


My favourite hated bloggers

5. warren2600war (current screen-name)/warren25smash/warren25

Genre: largely anti-political blogs from a racist view, but he also semi-consistently does horrible vlogs in a wide-range of other crap subjects (me, some guy with a pogo stick ranting about things, popping cherries. pop culture references, and more)

He can make what many consider to be boring subjects (politics, and news events) unending and unentertaining. He's known for delivering his points very aggressively and passionately in his vlogs, which I found disturbing. He often talks in a rapid, often explosive-laced fashion, and he sometimes is quite unfunny in making his points. Like many vloggers that swear like a sailor at times though, he isn't quite well-spoken.

*His account gets banned/deleted, so I HOPE he hasn't yet made another profile by the time people read this

4. patpedocondell

Genre: unfunny videos criticizing religion from a non-religious standpoint, what a nutcase.

His inability to find flaws in religions, and to present those flaws and to present his points in a unfunny fashion is quite remarkable. He has a dry, and stupid comedic delivery that doesn't go anywhere, and delivers his points with shitty precision. While he is great at making fun of birds shitting on brett keane, and poking his cock in holes -- he only seems to have this one dimension. I'd like to hear him talk about nothing but crayons and sniffing them, while criticizing those crazy mulisms, and I'd like to hear him talk about himself in some detail in a blog about how he masturbates to little kiddies  (I'm interested to know about the man behind the vlogs-- who is he?).

*The most unpopular/ and less subscribed atheist vlogger on ThierTube and the internet I'm aware of

3. dendropdeadfredhilian

Genre: unusual topics. Most known for his HIGHLY controversial views and ways of conveying his viewpoints on many subjects like religion, morality, and pop. culture, like making fun of jewish celebrities and using him in his flash videos burning them in a pile while hitler was laughing, I found that offensive.

He is arguably the most stupidiest vlogger out there, and many people see him as an extremist radical as a final view point. He tends to think about things in a crazy way, raises his cock at the cam, while using good points about making pedophilia legal, which isn't often brought up, and does these things in a highly entertaining fashion, that made me a fan :) . The downsides of his vlogs (and these things prevent him from being number 1 in my mind) are that he often seems to be overly-unfunny acts that just get more attention then me (and/or to troll people to entertain himself perhaps?), and he talks about himself, every time, I hate when people do, he even tells people he makes videos even when he doesn't know it, huh? . And just like with patpedocondell-- I want to know more about necrophila, i wanna get into that.

2. AngryAussieBastard.

Genre: Unusual topics; truly predictable. Videos can be about virtually about bbqs and dingos stealing babies.

This guy talks about all sorts of things(but not me, sadly)-- from the important news issues in his outback, down to insignificant but funny personal antidotes on how to get smugfags banned. He is often unfunny in his videos when he tells jokes about dead babies, I cried hard when he mentioned my mom, and he has been very consistent across time in the quality of his videos. Entertaining consistently, and often at least somewhat informative in some way too, which keeps me up in my pedophilia affairs. He structures his videos so well-- they always seem to be delivered in a focused, professional manner as far as the delivery of his message goes. Epic output of videos; often averages around 5 videos per week. Also-- unlike everyone else in this list-- he is a controversial vlogger. Due to flaming me and sending me death threats, like "fuck ya cunt" or "you motherfucking shit cunt, you wanna have a fight, ya cunt?"

1. Brett "Burger King"  Keane

Genre: usually criticizing religion, but also consistently goes into many subjects (personal life(I highly doubt I want to speak about my boring life), music, politics, and more)

The worst combination overall of entertainment, vlogs that make people dumber, and too many videos. His videos are boring as hell, and have drawn many into his trailer park of doom. On the surface of it, he seems nearly as dumber as the aforementioned vloggers(though I'm more smarter then brett keane, lol), but he has a knack for saying things that are "deep in his ass" and thoughtful in a way that can make him seem of average tool on the surface-- and he does so in a way of the general public can easily be confused(albeit many often disagree with it, like me :) ). He has a multitude of uninteresting opinions and has many interests that bore (which shows up in his vlogs), and he has a rare talent of making long (over 8 min.) vlogs unwatchable. He is also a shady character who has allowed the public a deep glimpse into his uninteresting life. He is unfunny in many of his videos in some way or another. He is a skilled shit talker, debater, and critic of many things. Also-- like AngryAussie-- he has a prodigious frequency of making videos (he's made over 900 in about a year and a half!, and that proves he's far more awesome then me, but still a shitty blogger, I even fell asleep!).

There are my 5 favorite hated vloggers ever-- outside of myself OF COURSE!!! :)